|
|
Post by KapitänHöhlenmensch on Mar 12, 2008 9:01:10 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Adam on Mar 12, 2008 9:09:09 GMT
It certainly would do me too. Although, I notice all theyve done is taken the existing league positions, kept everyone the same and multiplied up the points. I can't really see the Met Plod finishing 5 points clear of us, in fact I think we'll possibly even squeeze fourth.
With my logical mind on, its possible that the results against inferior teams have clouded my judgement and that the games against teams of similar stature will show whether we really have the balls for it.
|
|
|
|
Post by KapitänHöhlenmensch on Mar 12, 2008 9:19:31 GMT
Yeah they have.
I agree that K's will be a test, as will Dulwich, especially without Ben Andrews, my player of the season.
I think, however, Met will fall away as they've a tough run in and are poor. They always flop too.
Cray and Tooting aree shoe ins and I'd guess it's between us, Met, Dulwich and K's for the other place.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brad on Mar 12, 2008 11:06:53 GMT
I'd be happy just scraping in to the play-offs, as our performance before our current run deserved us not too be in there by miles
|
|
|
|
Post by Sam Skilton on Mar 12, 2008 16:05:41 GMT
i would expect us to do better than 4 winds 1 draw and 3 losses because we are in much better form now than our average form.
the higher we are in the playoffs the better because it means we will have more home matches.
|
|
|
|
Post by Herr Wurst on Mar 12, 2008 16:17:54 GMT
I think we'd all settle for 5th place at this stage considering the horror period of December through until early February. Anything higher will be a bonus. Oh, what might have been had we won those *winnable* matches and drawn others we should never have lost...well, on paper anyway.   |
|
|
|
Post by Kenty in Weardale on Mar 12, 2008 16:36:02 GMT
Being selfish, for us exiles many away games are easier/cheaper to attend nah nah nee nah nah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Though I would still prefer Woodside
|
|
